Map the AI rules where you live
Find out which laws, strategies and guidance apply to AI in your country, and fit them onto one page.
Laws, institutions and public debate about AI.
AI policy covers the rules governments make about AI, such as the EU AI Act, national AI safety institutes, public-sector use of algorithms and liability for harm. It also covers wider effects on jobs, elections and the balance of power.
Most starter projects need public documents, a spreadsheet and careful reading.
Short projects with numbered steps.
Find out which laws, strategies and guidance apply to AI in your country, and fit them onto one page.
Summarise how the EU sorts AI systems by risk (banned, high-risk, transparency duties, minimal) with one everyday example for each level, plus what changes for general-purpose models.
Pick one case from the AI Incident Database and write it up like an accident investigator: what happened, who was harmed, why, and what rule or practice would have prevented it.
The MIT AI Risk Repository organises over a thousand AI risks into a shared taxonomy. Use it to classify 20 recent news stories, then look at what the pattern tells you.
UK public bodies publish records about the algorithmic tools they use under the Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard. Read five records and assess what is disclosed and what is missing.
Gather 6–12 friends, give each a stakeholder role (lab, regulator, journalist, public) and play out how society responds to a fictional AI incident.
Pull together public survey data on AI from Pew Research and Our World in Data, and present the three charts that best show how people feel about AI risk.
Pick one decision-maker, one AI risk and one decision they actually face. Lay out the options and make a clear recommendation in two pages.
Which countries require AI developers to disclose safety testing, incidents or training details? Build a comparative tracker of transparency and disclosure rules.
If an employee at an AI company sees something dangerous, what protects them if they speak up? Compare protections across two or three jurisdictions.
Explain how liability and insurance could shape AI companies’ behaviour, using one realistic harm scenario to make it concrete.
Combine public data on how AI is being used for different tasks with local labour-market statistics to estimate which jobs in your region are most exposed.
Millions of people talk to AI companions. Review the evidence on benefits and harms and propose proportionate safeguards.
Separate hype from evidence: how persuasive are AI systems in practice, and what does that mean for elections and democratic debate?
Build a nonpartisan tracker of your representatives’ public statements on AI: everyday harms, geopolitics and catastrophic risks.
The International AI Safety Report is the shared scientific picture of AI risk, written for governments. Turn one chapter into a short, local-audience summary.
Kulveit et al. argue AI could slowly erode human influence over the economy, culture and the state. Propose three measurable indicators for each domain using public data, and say which would warn us earliest.
AI could make institutions better or worse at reasoning and coordinating. Prototype one tool or evaluation from BlueDot’s decision-making hackathon or Forethought’s design sketches.
Projects from other themes, and general projects that work in any theme.
Companies make synthetic DNA to order. Screening those orders and the customers who place them is one of the main defences against engineered pandemics. Explain how it works and where the gaps are.
Expand a handful of existing case studies into 25–40 profiles of legitimate and concerning customers, including historical cases of people who ordered dangerous biological material.
What should happen when someone discovers that a new tool could break existing defences, such as evading DNA screening? Draft a responsible-disclosure framework.
Compare how countries handle biosecurity suspicious-activity reports (reporting chains, data storage, privacy, jurisdiction gaps) against the financial sector’s anti-money-laundering systems.
How many critical workers would a city need to protect? How much indoor space is there? What data would a government want on day one of a crisis?
Where is AI actually speeding up work on medical countermeasures, and where are regulation, trials or manufacturing the main bottleneck?
Reasoning about the economic impacts of frontier AI: how does AI diffuse through work, how do new tasks emerge, how does household use substitute for labor, how do technical benchmarks relate to economic indicators.
Economics of AISocietal impacts
Starter project: Map the AI rules where you live or Check how the UK government discloses its algorithms
Interview people working in AI safety and people in their lives who aren't immersed in the field to understand how AI safety work affects relationships, how career choices and beliefs are perceived, and what helps people communicate across differences in worldview.
GeneralistCommunicationsSocietal impacts
Starter project: Make one piece of AI safety content or Map the AI rules where you live
Most AI labour research stops at estimating which jobs are exposed; this project asks when AI-driven disruption in Southeast Asia’s export-service economies could cascade into a broader economic and governance shock—and what governments can do before it does. Mentees will build and stress-test early-warning indicators, transition scenarios and policy triggers for anticipatory action.
Societal impactsEconomics of AIAI strategy
Starter project: Run an AI policy tabletop exercise or Map the AI rules where you live
AI is shaping how people and institutions decide, but we can barely measure whether it makes decisions better, the tools that would help struggle to get adopted, and what matters most in this space. This project works across three workstreams: building decision-making benchmarks for models, researching how to most effectively improve decision making with AI, and producing a cause prioritisation for the field.
Societal impactsBehavioral evaluation of LLMsAI strategy
Starter project: Build your first mini-eval or Make one piece of AI safety content
This project builds a comprehensive, interactive public resource mapping every intersection between artificial intelligence and First Amendment doctrine across all six clauses and their implied rights. Mentees will research existing precedent, identify novel legal questions, and produce in-depth analyses that serve as both a reference taxonomy and a foundation for future publications in tech policy outlets and law reviews.
US policySocietal impactsAI strategy
Starter project: Sort 20 AI news stories with the MIT AI Risk Repository or Map the AI rules where you live
Most jurisdictions still concentrate handling of "AI" as a topic in a few government units, but TAI will have impacts for the work of every part of every government. We should develop agendas for whole-of-government TAI preparedness, both generically and specific to high-priority countries.
National policyAI strategySocietal impacts
Starter project: Check how the UK government discloses its algorithms or Map the AI rules where you live