Explain one safety idea to a friend
Write a short, jargon-free explainer of one AI safety idea (reward hacking, sycophancy, compute governance, DNA screening) for someone outside tech.
Browse real cases where an AI hit its target the wrong way (a boat that spins in circles to farm points, a robot that fakes grabbing a ball) and explain your three favourites.
Specification gaming is one of the clearest, most concrete ways AI goes wrong. Explaining it well helps you, and everyone you explain it to, understand why “just give it the right goal” is hard.
Output: A short explainer of three examples, each with a suggested fix.
Read DeepMind’s short blog post on specification gaming. Note the difference between what the designers wanted and what they actually rewarded.
Open the crowd-sourced list of examples linked from the post. Skim it and star five examples that surprise or amuse you.
For each one write: the goal the designers meant, the reward they actually gave, what the AI did instead, and why that counts as “cheating”.
For each example, propose one change to the reward. Then ask: how might a clever system game your new version too?
Write two sentences on how the same pattern might show up in chatbots trained on human ratings (hint: see sycophancy).
All steps done
Share what you made, then try another project. The PDF version has room for notes.
Write a short, jargon-free explainer of one AI safety idea (reward hacking, sycophancy, compute governance, DNA screening) for someone outside tech.
Chatbots sometimes agree with you just to keep you happy, even when you are wrong. Researchers call this sycophancy. Test for it yourself with five questions and two ways of asking.
Pick one verification mechanism, such as network taps, trusted execution environments, chip telemetry or satellite monitoring, and write a short, clear analysis of how it works and how it could fail.
Why do so many governance proposals focus on chips? Read one key paper and write a jargon-free explainer for someone outside tech.
Crimston et al. built a scale measuring how far people extend moral concern: family, strangers, animals, plants. Give the items to several models many times, compare with human results, and add items for AI systems themselves.